10/05/2026
BAILEY VS. PRITZKER — WHAT ARE THEY ACTUALLY PROMISING ILLINOIS?
With Election Day less than a month away, Illinois voters have heard plenty of speeches, attack ads and campaign talking points.
So let's strip away the noise.
Here’s where Darren Bailey and Gov. JB Pritzker say they want to take Illinois on six issues that hit close to home: taxes, schools, energy, public safety, cost of living and state spending.
No endorsement. No winner. Their positions, side by side.
TAXES
BAILEY: Says Illinois has a spending problem rather than a revenue problem. He opposes increases in the state income and sales taxes and has proposed a 1% property-tax cap, while arguing the state could redirect spending to help schools offset reduced local property-tax revenue.
PRITZKER: Points to elimination of the state grocery tax, the Child Tax Credit and other targeted tax relief. His administration also defends the roughly $55.9 billion FY2027 budget as balanced and fiscally responsible.
SCHOOLS
BAILEY: Wants more authority returned to parents and local school districts and fewer mandates from Springfield. He argues increased education spending hasn't produced strong enough academic results.
PRITZKER: Wants continued state investment in education and points to increased K-12 funding, preschool expansion, improved graduation rates, vocational programs and increased college financial aid.
One important fact-check: Bailey has sometimes overstated the percentage of Illinois students performing below proficiency. Illinois does have significant proficiency challenges, but the statewide numbers aren't as high as some of his campaign statements have suggested.
ENERGY
BAILEY: Supports economic development and data centers but argues existing residents shouldn't be stuck paying for the infrastructure and energy costs associated with them. He has proposed taking a harder look at state tax incentives.
PRITZKER: Previously promoted data-center incentives as an economic-development tool. His administration has since paused new incentive agreements amid concerns about electricity demand, water use and costs to consumers.
Neither candidate is simply saying "no data centers."
The disagreement is increasingly about who pays for the growth and what conditions Illinois puts on it.
PUBLIC SAFETY
BAILEY: Continues to criticize the SAFE-T Act and elimination of cash bail. He promises stronger support for law enforcement and tougher treatment of violent and repeat offenders.
PRITZKER: Defends Illinois' current pretrial system, where judges can detain defendants considered dangerous rather than detention depending on someone's ability to post cash. He also points to Illinois State Police hiring, violence-prevention programs, crime-lab investments and gun-control measures.
COST OF LIVING
Both candidates say Illinois families need relief. Their approaches are very different.
BAILEY: Connects affordability primarily to taxes, property taxes, utility costs and government spending. His argument is that reducing government's financial footprint leaves families and businesses with more of their own money.
PRITZKER: Emphasizes targeted government action, including elimination of the grocery tax, tax credits, childcare assistance, prescription-drug initiatives and temporary tax-relief measures.
Put simply:
Bailey is largely promising affordability through lower taxes and less government spending.
Pritzker is largely promising affordability through targeted tax relief, credits and government programs.
STATE SPENDING
BAILEY: Wants a broad audit of Illinois government to identify waste, potential fraud and programs that could be eliminated or reduced. He argues those savings could help finance tax relief and other priorities.
PRITZKER: Defends continued state investment while pointing to Illinois' improved financial condition during his administration, including balanced budgets, elimination of the old bill backlog, required pension contributions and multiple credit-rating upgrades.
And both men have questions they'll eventually have to answer beyond campaign slogans.
Bailey needs to explain where enough spending can realistically be cut to finance his proposed tax relief and other priorities.
Pritzker needs to explain when Illinois' improved state finances will translate into enough household relief for residents who still feel squeezed.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Strip away the commercials and personalities, and these are two substantially different approaches to governing Illinois.
Pritzker: Continue investing through state government, maintain the fiscal direction of his administration and use targeted programs and tax relief to address affordability.
Bailey: Reduce taxes and government spending, audit state programs, return more authority to local communities and parents, and change Illinois' approach to public safety and affordability.
Illinois voters shouldn't have to choose based on who produces the better commercial.
Ask both candidates the same questions:
What will you cut? What will you fund? What happens to my taxes? What happens to my electric bill? What changes in my child's school? And how will my family know whether your policies actually worked?
Those are the questions worth answering before Election Day.
WGO NEWS | LOCAL NEWS. LOCAL VOICE.
What's Going On Kendall County, Illinois