30/05/2026
And here we go again, stomping on the financial opportunities for women in health services (imho).
The Fair Work Commission has updated the Health Professionals and Support Services Award (it covers psychs, counselling roles and in some instances depending on the role, social workers).
Quick overview:
The changes came about in recognition of gender inequality in the helping professions. The intention as I understand is to boost wages but as I'm interpreting it, it's a double-edged sword. It removes some things and replaces them with others.
Imagine a big playground where all the grown-ups who help people with their health (like psychologists, counsellors, and some social workers) are paid based on how much school they finished.
Right now, the playground has a complicated rulebook about who gets paid what. So, the people in charge wanted to make a new , simpler rulebook. In this new rulebook, the main thing that decides your pay is how much school you completed, called the AQF level. The higher the school level you completed, the more you get paid and the higher pay rises you'll get every year ongoing.
Here’s how it could look:
Imagine a counsellor who has finished a very high level of school like a Masters (AQF 9).
In the new rulebook, they would get a bigger pay raise each year than the counsellors that didn't, somewhere between 18.77% and 31.16% more money.
Now, imagine a counsellor who has finished a lower school level like a counselling Diploma (AQF 5). In the new rulebook, they would get not only a smaller starting salary, but they would also get much smaller pay rises each year, roughly 10-15%.
Broadly speaking: higher school level = bigger starting salary and ongoing bigger annual pay raises.
Some counsellors who used to be paid more under the old rules might get less money in the new system. To stop that from happening, the people in charge have said:
“If anyone would get paid less under the new rules, we will keep paying them what they get now while they’re already working here. Their pay won’t go down.”
That’s the transitional arrangement / recommendation. Basically, you won’t lose money, but new counsellors starting later ie after 1 October 2026, will be paid according to the new school-level rules from what I can see.
The FWC have said they've taken the approach of, 'start lower, stay lower'. Start lower means you're starting work on a lower qualification for lower pay from day one. Then, you get a lower percentage pay rise annually than other qualifications like a bachelors, ongoing. So you'll still get a pay rise, but it'll be more slowly than those above you. And, because the changes mean pay is determined by qualification, the pathway to more pay is via more courses and degrees.
What start low, stay low can look like:
Imagine two counsellors starting work at the same time:
Sue has Diploma of Counselling (AQF 5) → starts at $60,000/year, gets 3% raises each year.
Kim: Bachelor + Master (AQF 9) → starts at $90,000/year, gets 5% raises each year.
After 10 years:
Sue: $60,000 → ~$80,635/year
Kim: $90,000 → ~$146,640/year
Sue is still far behind, even though they both worked the same number of years.
I guess my major concern is for women, especially those looking to enter the workforce because this proposal would essentially mean their locked into a lower pay grade potentially for most of their career, from the outset.
The other issue I have is that many of the women counsellors, psychs and social workers started later. They've already had time out of the workforce, missed out on salary / pay rises / accruing their long service leave hours and their superannuation and now, even though they go and get a qualification, they're again, behind - out of the gate.
Some women opt for a Diploma because it's maybe more affordable compared to tertiary education or because the time commitment is more manageable or because it can be completed more quickly than a bachelors and therefore means they can get out and start earning. So how is it fair to expect them to cough up money for tertiary degrees they may not have for a degree they don't want to do and then how long will it take them to recover from the expense - sorry, the 'investment' - anyway? If she got credit for her diploma and paid 60K for the degree, she'd go from AQF5-7 and average roughly a 12K year increase - so she's still behind for a full five years.
If she didn't get credit for the diploma or if the course she did was more expensive ie 90K for the bachelors, with the jump from AQF5-7, she's waiting just over 7 years to recover financially.
Now, if we go by the ACA's data, it shows 59% so say 60, of counsellors are aged 41-60 years. Do you think these beautiful souls 'aren't' being disadvantaged under this new system or do you think women counsellors, psychs and social workers will be better off?
You can read more and see the updated award at fair work Australia. If you employ health professionals and or support services staff under this award, you may want to check-in with your HR rep to ensure you're across the changes and what they mean for your practice (some people may need pay rises, others may need transitioning, etc). You also may find it helpful to speak with an accountant about the changes if they apply to your practice. The information I've shared here is just my quick read and I'm not an expert or fully across this aka don't rely on Facebook for you info x
PS: I've just used Counsellors here for illustration. If you're a Psych, as I understand the Psych Board has a consultation up about this given their proposed changes to becoming a psych going from 5+1 to a 5 qualification only and they'll be calling it a Bach. This could obviously have a significant impact on your pay etc - please keep an eye on the Psych Board website, the AAPi and the APS for info as it unfolds. Likewise for Social Workers - this may impact you based on roles etc so please do ask the AASW or other reliable sources for info / clarity as things unfold.