Midwestern Firearms

pictures from the past

Closed To loyal customers thank you.

Small man big ego.

Sad to announce that after 26 years in business Midwestern Fi****ms will be closing its doors.The combination of national business climate and the draconian laws by the governor and the minions from Chicago basically destroyed businesses. For those who used our provided services thanks. For those loyal customers who bought from us rather the big box stores, Thank you. To the coffee club thanks for the entertainment. We have met and made many friends and had some pass on. A sad good bye to you all. We will have a final sale of items Sat June 8th.

Choosing a Buckshot Load for Home Defense

Written by: Greg Ellifritz



Although I’m not well known for it in the commercial arena, I really enjoy teaching shotgun classes. In fact, the first fi****ms instructor school that I attended was a Benelli shotgun instructor school taught by Phil Singleton (of SAS and HK fame) way back in 1999. I taught police shotgun classes quarterly from the years 2000-2013. I also taught several of TDI’s shotgun classes during my early years teaching there. Despite having all the cool carbines on the market, I still rely on a couple of shotguns for my primary home defense long guns.



What prompted this article was a long discussion I had with Tom Givens at the instructor dinner during the recent Rangemaster Tactical Conference. Tom forced me to confront some facts that I actually knew well, but I wasn’t considering in the right context. His advice caused me to change my thinking about buckshot loads for home protection.



I’ve long been a proponent of very tightly patterning buckshot loads for police shotguns. As soon as I became rangemaster, I changed our shotgun duty load from a standard 9-pellet Federal 00 Buck load, to the much more tighter patterning Hornady 8-pellet load. At the time, the even tighter Federal Flight control buckshot hadn’t yet been invented.



For cop shotguns we want tight patterns for a few reasons. The most obvious is that we don’t want to hit an innocent bystander with a stray pellet from a wide pattern. Tighter patterns also extend the effective range of the shotgun. With standard 00 buck loads, the pattern size starts opening up quickly beyond 30-40 feet. Depending on the particular load and the shotgun’s choke, at somewhere between 20 and 30 yards, a few of the pellets will have spread wider than the chest of a silhouette target. With the tighter patterning loads, the range is extended to 35-40 yards before pellets start missing the target. That’s a big difference.



Because of the shorter ranges encountered in a home defense scenario, I’ve historically believed that a wider pattern spread would be beneficial because of the greater chance of hitting a moving target. I don’t need a 40-yard capability in a shotgun when the longest shot I can physically take in my house is a measured 12 yards. Why not open the pattern size up a little bit to increase the odds of getting a hit?



Tom convinced me that this thinking was erroneous. He was, of course, correct. Let’s talk about why a tighter pattern is better, even for short range home defense.



“Patterning” is the act of checking the group size at various ranges with your defensive loads. I’ve fired hundreds of patterning shots over the years in all my classes so that I know the approximate size of my groups at various ranges. In our police issue Benelli M-1 shotguns with improved cylinder chokes, the Hornady 8-pellet load stays one hole out to 20 feet. At 50 feet, all the pellets will stay in an area the size of a person’s head. At 75 feet, the pellets easily stay in the chest area of a silhouette target. At somewhere around 90 feet (30 yards) pellets start missing the chest of a silhouette.



These are good benchmarks to have committed to memory and I encourage you to do such patterning with your own defensive loads to better understand the pattern sizes that your shotgun will make.

Patterning a short barrel Benelli M-1



When you start doing a lot of patterning shots, a couple things become obvious. The first is that the guideline of shotgun pattern spread being “one inch per yard” of distance is absolutely incorrect. That might work with some birdshot, but it doesn’t hold true with modern buckshot loads. Patterns with defensive loads are much tighter than that.



The second thing that you will see with 12 gauge 9-pellet 00 buck loads, as ranges increase the chances for a “flyer” increase. In the 9-pellet loads, the buckshot pellets bang into each other as they go down the barrel. Inevitably, at least one of the pellets becomes slightly deformed and doesn’t fly the same as the rest of the round pellets. Once you get out to somewhere around 40 feet, you’ll see a fairly regular pattern with 8/9 of the pellets. The 9th pellet will be separate from this group by several inches. That’s why most of the specialty tight patterning 00 buck shot load only contain 8 pellets. They eliminate “the flyer.”



Tom told me about three different shootings he investigated where an innocent bystander was hit by “the flyer” from a 00 buck load fired at a criminal. A couple of those bystanders were killed by that single pellet. Hmm…maybe having a tighter pattern is more important than I initially thought if innocents are also down range.



Tom then explained to me that the true advantage of the shotgun isn’t that it has a wide pattern spread to easier hit moving targets. The advantage of the shotgun is in the sheer devastation those buckshot rounds create. Shotgun wounds are far more impressive than most rifle or handgun wounds. It’s rare that someone will need to be shot more than once or twice with buck shot. We regularly see criminals and enemy soldiers soaking up half a dozen or more handgun or carbine rounds.



What I knew (but Tom had to re-explain to me) is that in close range fights, shotgun patterns don’t vary all that much between the widest patterning loads and the loads that shoot the tightest pattern. At 15 feet, a tightly shooting buck shot pattern will be somewhere between one and two inches across. The fastest spreading buckshot will create a pattern that measures two to three inches across.



After all my patterning drills, I knew this fact. But it took Tom to explain it in context:

“Do you really think that one inch of extra pattern spread will increase your likelihood of getting a good hit? No matter if you have a big pattern or a tight pattern, you’re still going to have to aim the shotgun precisely at close range to get the hit. With the larger patterns, you don’t get any real advantage at very close ranges, but those big patterns are a huge disadvantage if you have to take a longer shot.”



To illustrate this issue, I did some patterning exercises to show you group sizes from two different buckshot loads at a few different ranges. I used the shotgun that I own that shoots the absolute widest patterns to best illustrate the concept. It is a 14″ barrel cylinder bore Benelli M-1 Super 90.



I shot the tightly patterning Hornady TAP Semi-auto 8-pellet 00 buck load on one side of the target. I compared it with the standard Re*****on green box 9-pellet 00 buck load on the other side of the target. Take a look at the difference at close range.

Hornady on left. Re*****on on right. Target circles are 3″ for scale.



At typical “home defense distances inside of 20 feet, there is a large relative difference in pattern size. But that relative difference doesn’t translate into any useful advantage. Here are the statistics:



At 10 feet: Hornady= 1.25 inches Re*****on = 2.75 inches

At 20 feet: Hornady= 1.5 inches Re*****on = 3.0 inches



Patterns are twice as big with the Re*****on loads. But does it really matter when you are talking about a difference in pattern size from 1.5 inches to three inches? The answer is “no.”



What about if we take the two loads out a little farther?



At 30 feet: Hornady= 2.25 inches Re*****on = 6.0 inches

At 40 feet: Hornady= 8.5 inches Re*****on = 9.0 inches plus one additional flyer off the target





If you are counting bullet holes on the photo above, things won’t work out right. I had a completely unexpected result when I shot the first 40′ Hornady load. Only 4 of the 8 pellets hit the target. Either the shell was improperly loaded or the pellets stayed in the wad. I’ve never seen that happen in thousands of rounds fired of that particular load. I marked the four and then fired an additional shot at the 40 foot target and got a more normal grouping.



I’ve been encouraging folks for years to load larger patterning buckshot loads in their home defense weapons. That was bad advice. I thank Tom Givens for setting me straight.



What load should you choose for home defense? I don’t know. You’ll have to pattern a few out of your own shotguns and find out what works best. In general I would offer the following advice:

– In 12 gauge, choose either 00 or #1 Buck

– If you choose 00 buck, pick an 8-pellet load instead of the 9-pellet load

– Stay away from the 3″ magnum loads. The additional recoil is not worth putting a couple more pellets on target

– Stay away from the “low recoil” loads in inertia operated semi-auto shotguns.

– Consider the tighter shooting Hornady TAP. Federal FliteControl or the copper plated buck shot loads.



Now, buy a few different loads and go out and pattern your shotguns!



Thanks to Tom Givens for setting me down a better path and to Bryan McKean for taking the photos of my test.

Disparity of Force
Lethal force comes in all shapes and sizes.
by SHERIFF JIM WILSON posted on May 22, 2024
NEWS, TIPS

Support NRA Shooting Illustrated DONATE
Sheriff Jim Wilson
One of the terms that many armed citizens are not aware of is “disparity of force.” Now, let me be clear, I am not an attorney and cannot give you legal advice. What I can do is make you aware of the term and encourage you to do some research.

Disparity of force is when your attacker, though unarmed, is still capable of causing death or serious bodily injury, thus justifying a deadly force response. This may take many forms and almost certainly will vary from situation to situation. Here are some examples that might apply.

A young woman (110 pounds) was attacked in her parking lot by a man who weighed well over 200 pounds. Her attacker was telling her, graphically, what he was going to do to her as he grabbed her. When the woman resisted, the man struck her one blow to the face which busted two of her front teeth. As she hit the ground, she grabbed her .38 snub-nosed revolver from her purse and fired, stopping the attack.

In another case, a male attacker broke into the home of an 80-year old man who suffered from a serious case of arthritis. The much younger attacker demanded money and said he would kill the victim if he did not comply. The victim fled to a bedroom, followed by his attacker, and armed himself with a shotgun. One load of buckshot stopped the attack. The home invader was not armed.

The disparity of force defense might also apply if a person is attacked by several street punks who threaten physical violence because it would be unreasonable to expect one person to engage in a fist fight with several people at once. And it would almost certainly apply if the victim had physical disabilities that prevent him or her from effectively defending themselves.

On one case that I am aware of a deputy sheriff responded to a domestic quarrel. His attacker, much larger than the deputy, attacked with a jump kick that shattered both bones in the deputy’s lower right leg. From the ground, the deputy drew his gun and told the attacker to back off. The attacker grinned and raised his boot to stomp the deputy. He was killed with one shot and a grand jury ruled that the shooting was justified.

All of these cases provide examples where a jury, judge, or prosecutor could conclude that the armed defender had a reasonable belief that they would face death or great bodily harm if they didn’t act. It’s important to remember that, as with other cases of self-defense, disparity of force will be examined to determine if the victim’s fears were justified and his or her response reasonable under the circumstances. So, it is important for the responsibly armed citizen to research disparity of force and understand it. It is also important to seek the advice of an experienced attorney licensed to practice in your state to completely understand the term and how it is applied in the local courts. Disparity of force – do your research.

https://www.shootingillustrated.com/content/shooting-practice-for-a-criminal-encounter/

An Official Journal Of The NRA | Shooting Practice for a Criminal Encounter Improving your pistol skills using the Louisiana concealed carry test.

A few CCL instructors Carl Lutz 309-613-0724, Kelly O'Keefe 309-657-5643 Jon Stmmonds 309-657 -0200 (renewal only)

An Official Journal Of The NRA | Best Barrel Length for a Shotgun? Shotgun barrels come in many lengths. Which is best for defense?

An Official Journal Of The NRA | The Age-Old Debate Are revolvers out of date? Not hardly, says Sheriff Jim

Sporting Clays for Scouting yelebrates 3rd year at Camp Saukenauk Clay pigeon shooters had their sights on Camp Saukenauk Wednesday