Herzig Engineering

Multi-site organizations often struggle with inconsistent electrical safety practices between facilities.

Different labeling approaches, varying maintenance standards, and inconsistent documentation can create confusion for employees working across locations.

Centralized programs help create consistency, improve visibility, and reduce administrative burden while ensuring workers receive the same quality of information regardless of facility location.

Consistency is one of the most powerful tools in large-scale safety management.

Learn more: https://vist.ly/5bv86

Myth: If equipment looks fine on the outside, it must be safe.

Reality: we’ve scanned panels that looked pristine; fresh paint and clean labels, only to find glowing hot spots inside.

Electrical failures don’t announce themselves with smoke or noise until it’s too late. That’s why thermal imaging is so powerful, it gives you a glimpse of tomorrow’s failures today.

Learn more about IR scanning: https://vist.ly/5bqza

Too often, electrical safety conversations start and end with PPE. But as this hierarchy shows, PPE is the last line of defense, not the first.

The real goal is to work our way through the pyramid in order: eliminate hazards where possible, substitute safer methods, and engineer risks down to manageable levels. Administrative controls and awareness reinforce that foundation. PPE is the backup plan, not the strategy.

When workers only hear “wear your suit,” they miss the bigger picture: the safest job is the one where risk was already reduced before they ever put on gear.

https://vist.ly/5bn2b

A finished arc flash study doesn't mean a compliant program. It means the real work is about to start.

NFPA 70E and NEC require field-applied labels on every piece of equipment before energized work resumes, each one listing incident energy, PPE category, arc flash boundary, and the study date. A hazard that's been calculated but never labeled is still an open compliance gap.

PPE selection works the same way. A worker in Category 1 gear standing in front of Category 3 switchgear isn't protected, they're exposed. Training closes the loop, too: NFPA 70E 110.4 requires workers be trained on the hazards they'll actually face, updated whenever a new study changes the numbers.

Where in your program is the gap between "we have a study" and "we're actually compliant"?

Read the full guide: https://vist.ly/5bjrw

What to Do After an Arc Flash Study: Labels, PPE, and Training Receiving your arc flash study report is a significant milestone for any facility. But for many safety managers and plant engineers, the real question surfaces right after: now what? The report identifies hazards, calculates incident energy levels, and defines arc flash boundaries for each piece of....

Lockout/tagout procedures should never be treated as static documents.

As equipment changes, production lines expand, and facilities evolve, energy isolation procedures need to evolve as well. Disconnect locations, stored energy sources, and shutdown sequences can all change over time.

Reviewing procedures regularly helps ensure workers have accurate information before maintenance begins. Small updates today can prevent major confusion tomorrow.

https://vist.ly/5bj9m

One of the most overlooked parts of safety culture is consistency from leadership.

Workers notice whether procedures are followed when production is running smoothly. They also notice what happens when schedules tighten, outages occur, and pressure increases.

The organizations with the strongest safety cultures are usually the ones where expectations remain consistent regardless of circumstances. When leaders demonstrate that safety procedures are non-negotiable, employees gain confidence in the process and are more likely to follow it themselves.

Culture isn't built through slogans. It's built through repeated actions.

https://vist.ly/5bgxk