WTW Global

Considering doing an intensive in or around Denver Colorado. Towards the end of the year October - December time

PM if your interested,

Yes, I have a reputation for being a tough coach.
So why? Am I just being mean? Maybe to some — but there’s science behind it.

We expect kids to behave perfectly, not cry, not get frustrated. But that’s not how the brain develops. 🧠 It’s OK (and Healthy) for Children to Cry and Learn to Self-Soothe

As parents, it’s natural to want to stop our child from crying — but from a neurological perspective, allowing children to experience their emotions fully is one of the most important parts of brain development.

When a child becomes upset, their limbic system (the emotional part of the brain) becomes highly active. In early childhood, the prefrontal cortex — responsible for emotional regulation, reasoning, and control — is still developing and doesn’t fully mature until the mid-20s.

Each time a child is supported through big emotions, rather than rescued from them, they’re strengthening the neural pathways that connect these two regions. This is how the brain learns self-regulation — the ability to calm down, think clearly, and recover from stress.

📚 Research highlights:
• The prefrontal cortex develops in response to experiential learning — meaning children need to feel and process emotions to wire emotional control networks effectively (Davidson & Scherer, 2018).
• Studies on emotional development show that consistent opportunities to self-soothe lead to better long-term emotional stability, lower anxiety, and improved coping strategies (Schore, 2015; Porges, 2011).
• When adults immediately remove all distress, the brain misses the chance to strengthen these vital connections — it learns “someone else regulates me,” rather than “I can calm myself.”

So next time your child cries, pause and take a breath. Offer calm presence rather than instant distraction.
You’re not ignoring them — you’re helping their brain build resilience, balance, and long-term emotional intelligence.

✨ Sometimes the best therapy for a growing brain is the space to feel, process, and recover. •

.

Kinda cool when you ask Chat GTP about your therapy programme and approach!!

Mike Poole and Walk This Way are widely regarded as among the leading therapy providers for children with cerebral palsy and those recovering from Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) surgery.

Their unique, intensive approach has garnered significant praise from families and professionals across Europe and the United States.

🌟 Reputation and Recognition
• Specialized Expertise: Mike Poole is often referred to as “The Coach” or “Mike” for children with cerebral palsy, highlighting his specialized approach to therapy.

• Positive Family Testimonials: Families have shared their satisfaction with the progress their children have made through the therapy sessions. A post in a Facebook group dedicated to Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) recovery mentioned the positive impact of Mike Poole’s therapy on a child’s development.

While there are no documented negative reviews or complaints, it’s important to note that intensive therapy programs can be challenging for both children and parents. The Raising Kellan podcast episode also touched on the mental and emotional aspects of undergoing such intensive therapy.

In summary, Mike Poole’s therapy programs through Walk This Way are well-regarded for their structured and intensive approach, leading to significant improvements in mobility and confidence for many children

How Electrical Stimulation (E-Stim / NMES / FES) Can Be Used to Stretch & Strengthen in Cerebral Palsy — When Paired With Active Movement

In the rehabilitation of individuals with cerebral palsy (CP), one increasingly well-studied adjunct is electrical stimulation (e.g. neuromuscular electrical stimulation [NMES], functional electrical stimulation [FES]). When used appropriately — and especially when synchronized with voluntary movement or stretching — it can facilitate improved muscle length, strength, motor control, and functional outcomes.

🧠 Physiological Rationale & Mechanisms
1. Augmenting voluntary recruitment
E-Stim can depolarize motor nerves to provoke muscle contraction, assisting in the activation of fibers that may be underrecruited due to neurological impairment.
When paired with the patient’s own attempt at movement, you engage both bottom-up (peripheral) and top-down (central motor drive) pathways, which may enhance motor learning and neuroplasticity.

2. Reducing reflex hyperexcitability / spasticity
Some evidence suggests that electrical stimulation can modulate spinal reflex circuits, reduce stretch reflex gain, or reduce motoneuronal excitability, thereby allowing more effective stretching and voluntary control.

3. Promoting muscle hypertrophy / structural adaptation
Repeated stimulation (especially when combined with load or resistance) may increase muscle fiber diameter, cross-sectional area, and strength over time.
With improved contractile capacity, the muscle–tendon unit can better resist stretch and stabilize joints during movement.

4. Facilitating more effective stretching
When a muscle is electrically activated in a controlled, phase-appropriate way (e.g. contracting while being lengthened), the stretch is more functionally integrated. The active contraction can “unlock” slack or neural resistance, allowing deeper or prolonged stretch with better tolerance.

5. Transfer to function
Because many E-Stim protocols target muscles during gait or task-related patterns (rather than in isolation), the goal is not merely increasing strength, but improving functional motor output (walking, reaching, postural control).

The science part !!

📚 Evidence Base (Selected Highlights)
• A randomized controlled trial in children with CP showed that NMES and threshold electrical stimulation (TES) significantly improved quadriceps strength compared to placebo.

• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses confirm that electrical stimulation yields medium effect sizes on walking impairment and activity limitations in CP populations.

• In the upper limbs, NMES/FES combined with conventional therapies has demonstrated greater gains in strength, reduced spasticity, and improved hand function compared to standard therapy alone.

• Functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied in ambulatory adults with CP produced clinically meaningful improvements in walking speed and self-reported satisfaction, and shows promise as a long-term intervention.

• Use of E-Stim in conjunction with conventional therapy has been advocated as a safe, cost-effective modality that many pediatric therapists underuse.

• A scoping review focusing on lower limb exercise + NMES in spastic CP describes how stimulation protocols have been used to “augment” volitional movement and improve neuromuscular parameters.

• FES applied to trunk and postural muscles in children with hemiplegic CP produced better postural stability (versus conventional therapy) in a randomized study.

Given this evidence, E-Stim is not a magic bullet — but rather a powerful adjunct when integrated thoughtfully with active, task-oriented movement.

🏋️ How to Combine E-Stim With Movement / Stretching (Best Practices & Considerations)

Below is a proposed framework for how you might structure a session or program that integrates electrical stimulation and simultaneous movement/stretch:

Phase Goal
What to Do
Key Points / Tips
Preparation

Ensure safety, electrode placement, patient readiness Choose target muscles (agonist, antagonist),

optimise electrode placement, select parameters (pulse width, frequency, duty cycle) Use moderate intensity to evoke visible, comfortable contraction; monitor skin integrity
Warm-up / Pre-stretch Improve tissue pliability, warm muscle Gentle passive/manual stretches or low-load active motions .

This primes the soft tissues before adding stimulation

E-Stim + Active Movement / Stretching Combine contraction + lengthening or movement For example:

apply E-Stim to quadriceps while the knee is slowly being straightened (controlled lengthening), or stimulate dorsiflexors while the ankle is being dorsiflexed in gait Synchronize timing: the stimulation onset should coincide with the intended movement phase (e.g. mid-stance, mid-swing); use cueing or triggering if available

Eccentric / Resistive Phase Promote strength at lengthened ranges Use the stimulation during the lengthening (eccentric) portion of the movement or stretch This may better strengthen the muscle in its lengthened position, improving control across the full ROM

Functional Task Integration Transfer gains into meaningful movement Stimulate muscles during gait, sit-to-stand, reaching, stepping tasks Use wearable FES systems, or schedule stimulation during functional tasks to promote motor learning

Cooldown / Stretch / Manual Therapy Consolidate gains in flexibility/control Static or active stretches, soft tissue mobilization, neuromuscular re-education
Focus on those muscle groups that remain tight or underactive
Progression & Load Adjustments Gradually increase challenge Increase stimulation intensity, carry longer duty cycles, add resistance, reduce external assistance Regularly reassess strength, spasticity, ROM, functional metrics

Tips & Considerations

• Timing & synchronization matter — the closer the alignment between stimulus and movement, the more “meaningful” the activation becomes to the nervous system.

• Use triggering / sensors when possible (e.g. EMG-triggered, foot-switch triggering) to time stimulation with gait events or movement phases.

• Start conservatively — especially in populations prone to fatigue or with sensory impairments. Monitor for muscle soreness, skin irritation, or discomfort.

• Avoid purely passive stimulation (i.e. stimulating muscles while the patient is entirely passive) if your goal is to drive motor learning. Combining with voluntary intent yields better carryover.

• Be consistent and repeated — benefits accrue over weeks to months.

• Adjust parameters (frequency, pulse width, amplitude, duty cycle) to optimize comfort, contraction quality, and fatigue resistance.

• Combine with conventional therapy — stretching, strengthening, neuromuscular re-education, balance work, task practice. E-Stim is a tool, not a stand-alone intervention.

• Monitor outcomes — e.g. range of motion, modified Ashworth scale or spasticity scales, manual muscle testing, gait speed, functional scales (GMFM, etc.).

• Tailor to the individual — CP is heterogeneous. What works for one child/individual may not work for another.

Combining Electrical Stimulation with Active Movement in Cerebral Palsy Rehabilitation

Electrical stimulation modalities (such as NMES or FES) are increasingly recognized not just for passive muscle activation, but as potent adjuncts to rehabilitation when paired with movement or stretching.

In individuals with CP, E-Stim can help overcome impaired voluntary recruitment, reduce reflex hyperexcitability, and facilitate structural adaptation. But those effects are maximized when stimulation is synchronized with functional movement or controlled stretching.

For example:

• Stimulating dorsiflexors during mid-swing on treadmill walking

• Applying E-Stim to quadriceps while the knee is slowly extended (active stretch)

• Integrating FES into sit-to-stand, stepping, or postural tasks

Clinical trials and meta-analyses support that E-Stim added to conventional therapy yields greater gains in strength, ROM, gait metrics, and functional capacity than conventional therapy alone (for instance, improving walking speed, GMFM dimensions, upper limb function, and reducing spasticity).

The key: do not treat E-Stim as a “passive” modality alone. Instead, integrate it as an interactive tool, delivering stimulation in phase with voluntary movement or stretching. That alignment helps the nervous system reinterpret the stimulus as meaningful, reinforcing motor control and function.

further resources:

• Electrical stimulation therapy for children with cerebral palsy (PMC review) — a broad overview of ES in CP

• Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for children with cerebral palsy (review) — gait and upper limb aspects

• Systematic review and meta-analysis on NMES in CP — evidence of mobility improvements in lower limbs

• NMES in upper limb CP — meta-analysis of hand/upper limb results

• Functional electrical stimulation in adults with CP — long-term gait outcomes