The Speed Mechanic

Call Directions Website Contact the business

The Speed Mechanic The interventions I have with all clients is positive and encourage self development and growth as an athlete and as a person.

“Speed is an emergent behavior arising from the interaction between body, brain, and play.”

We apply sprint science, biomechanics & ecological dynamics to improve movement transfer across sports. Experienced and Professional Strength and Conditioning Coach that offers a progressive and educational program that follows the principle of Learn - Train - Sustain!!

Your fastest player may need the longest recovery. Most calendars ignore that. ⚡Availability is the most underrated perf...
07/10/2026

Your fastest player may need the longest recovery. Most calendars ignore that. ⚡

Availability is the most underrated performance KPI. A player who is injured can’t improve at anything.

Swipe through for what the evidence says:
→ Match fatigue can last 48-72 hours or more
→ The problem isn’t sprinting, it’s sudden spikes in sprint exposure
→ Growth spurts change how much load a player can tolerate
→ Prevention works, but only when it actually gets done

You can’t predict injuries. You can notice the pattern earlier and make a better coaching decision.

That’s the idea behind the Speed Intelligence System: track growth, sprint exposure, recovery time and readiness against each player’s own baseline, then investigate before you add load.

💬 Which is harder to protect in your environment: match congestion or growth spurts? Tell me below.

💾 Save this for your next planning meeting.
📤 Send it to the coach who sets the calendar.

Your player’s 10m time might not be a “speed” problem.In our SIS data (n = 11), standing broad jump distance and 10m acc...
06/10/2026

Your player’s 10m time might not be a “speed” problem.

In our SIS data (n = 11), standing broad jump distance and 10m acceleration showed a very strong association: r = -0.74, 54% shared variance.

Small sample, so this is a hypothesis, not a law. But it points to something most speed coaching skips: both tasks depend on how well a player projects their hips and body forward and pushes horizontally, not just how much force they have.

Before you add another drill, ask:
• Where are the hips relative to the feet at first contact?
• Is the jump strong but the 10m slow? Then look at start position, timing and reaction.
• Did it change in a game-like start, or only in the test?

Which is your player’s limiter: the jump, the start position, or the reaction? Tell me what you’re seeing below, and I’ll reply to every one.
Save this for your next testing session.

Follow for evidence-based speed coaching that tests assumptions instead of repeating them.

Your winger isn’t necessarily slow. 👇Our 1-2-1 testing data suggests athletes with near-identical 10m sprint times can h...
05/10/2026

Your winger isn’t necessarily slow. 👇

Our 1-2-1 testing data suggests athletes with near-identical 10m sprint times can have very different profiles, and those profiles may relate to different football actions:

⚡ Separation
⚡ Manipulation
⚡ Escape
⚡ Pe*******on
⚡ Support

Swipe to see how four archetypes map onto the movement matrix, and where the data goes quiet. Manipulation doesn’t map cleanly to any archetype, which is why we observe before we prescribe.

Honest note: this is an SIS hypothesis from our client base (4 to 29 athletes per archetype), not a validated classification. Treat it as a question to test with your own players.

Which one is your player? Comment SEPARATE, PE*****TE, ESCAPE or SUPPORT. And save this for your next session.

Follow for more evidence-informed speed coaching.

48% of the variation in 10m sprint performance moved with one number in our SIS athlete sample: step count.Before anyone...
04/10/2026

48% of the variation in 10m sprint performance moved with one number in our SIS athlete sample: step count.

Before anyone builds a drill around that, here is what the data can and can’t tell us.

- r = 0.69, R² = 47.8%, n = 30 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.84)
- It was 1 of 35 relationships screened. It clears a multiple-comparison correction, but it is still exploratory.
- 10m time is arithmetically linked to steps × time per step, so part of this relationship is built in.
- Correlation is not causation. Nothing here shows that cueing a change in step count makes an athlete faster.

The more useful insight: step count isn’t a quality you train. It’s a solution the athlete finds, shaped by Body, Brain and Play.

Counting steps is observation. Prescribing from it is an assumption.

Two athletes. Same 10m time. Different step counts.
What would you investigate first?

1. Force application
2. Timing and rhythm
3. Perception of the task

Comment 1, 2 or 3 and tell us why.

Save this for your next session review. Send it to a coach who prescribes from one number.

Link in bio: join the SIS membership waitlist.

Same age. Different speed. ⚡We looked at 10m sprint data from our testing, ages 9 to 16.The average athlete gets about 0...
02/10/2026

Same age. Different speed. ⚡

We looked at 10m sprint data from our testing, ages 9 to 16.

The average athlete gets about 0.3s faster across those seven years. But among 12-year-olds alone, the gap between fastest and slowest is around 0.6s. That’s double.

So when we group kids by birth year, what are we actually measuring?

Age tells you roughly when a child was born. It doesn’t tell you their maturity, coordination, strength or training history. And the data shows qualities develop at different rates: acceleration plateaus earlier, top speed keeps climbing, and jump and reactive qualities get messy around the growth spurt.

Train the athlete in front of you, not the birth certificate.

💬 Coaches: do you group by age or by ability? Tell me below.

🔖 Save this for your next session plan.

73% of the coaches we surveyed believe speed is holistic. 70% say their environment is what’s stopping them.Only 3 said ...
01/10/2026

73% of the coaches we surveyed believe speed is holistic. 70% say their environment is what’s stopping them.

Only 3 said facilities. 25 said time or competing demands.

That tells us something important: the issue isn’t what coaches believe. It’s that speed is still being treated as a separate block that has to be squeezed in.

The SIS approach starts with the problem you’re already seeing in your players, investigates what’s limiting the action, and tests one change inside your existing session.

👉 Which barrier is your biggest? Comment below.
👉 Save this for your next planning session.
👉 Follow for evidence-led speed coaching.

Data: 500 Speed Reflection, n = 40 coaches (self-reported).

Speed isn’t a number on a stopwatch. It’s a problem the player solves. ⚡Every session at The Speed Mechanic runs the sam...
30/09/2026

Speed isn’t a number on a stopwatch. It’s a problem the player solves. ⚡

Every session at The Speed Mechanic runs the same loop:

1. Assess. We watch speed inside the game problem: opposition, space, time and pressure. What did the player do, and what information were they using?

2. Hypothesise. Where’s the limiter? Is it the information, the decision, or how the body expresses the action? Before movement changes, information changes.

3. Intervene. One clear change, matched to the hypothesis. Physical work sits inside the loop rather than replacing it.

4. Re-assess. Back to the same problem. Was the action earlier, cleaner, more decisive? The result becomes new information, and the loop starts again.

That’s Play → Brain → Body: the problem, the information and decision, then the expression.

Swipe through to see how it works 👉 and drop a ⚡ if you’ve ever been told to “just get faster” without anyone asking why.

Book a session or join the Speed Intelligence System via the link in bio.

We just pulled the sprint data on 59 young athletes, ages 6 to 17.If speed developed the way most coaching still assumes...
29/09/2026

We just pulled the sprint data on 59 young athletes, ages 6 to 17.

If speed developed the way most coaching still assumes — linearly, with age, driven mainly by getting bigger — this graph would be clean. A smooth line down. Older always faster.

It isn’t clean. Not close.

Some 9-year-olds outrun some 15-year-olds. Reactive strength barely moves with age at all, while sprint times keep falling. Two players can post the exact same time and be limited by completely different things.

That’s the problem with “just get faster.” Speed isn’t one number, and it doesn’t come from one place — it’s Body, Brain and Play working together. When a player doesn’t perform the way their testing says they should, that’s not noise. That’s the diagnosis trying to tell you something.

Swipe through to see how we think about it differently. 📊

Which layer do you think gets ignored most in traditional speed training — Body, Brain, or Play? Drop it below 👇

Comment “SIS” and we’ll send you the framework.

28/09/2026

WE LOVE TALKING ABOUT LOAD MANAGEMENT.

Until it actually inconveniences us.

Every weekend I see young players doing:

Saturday: Schoolboy representative football.
Sunday: Academy football.

Then Monday training.

And we still talk about:

“Load management.”
“Injury prevention.”
“Player welfare.”
“Long-term development.”

Something doesn’t add up.

Football isn’t simply 90 minutes of exercise.

It’s acceleration, deceleration, sprinting, braking, cutting, jumping, landing, contact and thousands of high-speed perception–action decisions.

Research shows neuromuscular performance, force production and hamstring function can remain impaired for 24–48+ hours following match-play.

So what exactly are we expecting from the same player the following day?

The same:

→ Force
→ Stiffness
→ Coordination
→ Sprint ability
→ Braking ability
→ Decision-making
→ Technical ex*****on

Probably not.

And this isn’t just about injury.

It’s about performance.

The irony?

We monitor GPS.

We measure wellness.

We discuss ACWR.

We build dashboards.

Then someone says:

“He’s our best player. We need him.”

And suddenly load management disappears.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth:

Load management isn’t about collecting more data.

It’s about making better decisions with the data we already have.

And ACWR certainly isn’t a magic solution either. A large randomised trial in elite youth football found that an ACWR-based intervention did not reduce health problems.

The better question is:

What load has the player experienced, when did they experience it, what did it demand, and have they actually recovered?

Because:

Saturday → Sunday → Monday

isn’t automatically development.

Sometimes it’s simply competition density disguised as development.

If we genuinely care about:

Performance.
Development.
Injury reduction.
Player welfare.

Then those principles have to apply when they’re inconvenient.

Not just when they fit the schedule.

Maybe the biggest load-management problem in youth football isn’t a lack of data.

Maybe it’s a lack of willingness to act on it.

Every 1-2-1 starts on film. We diagnose the actual limiting factor — not technique, not generic drills — then intervene,...
27/09/2026

Every 1-2-1 starts on film. We diagnose the actual limiting factor — not technique, not generic drills — then intervene, and reassess inside the same session. Progress isn’t promised. It’s shown.

This profile is assessment 4 of an ongoing series for this player. Swipe to see the full breakdown → 👉

Which attractor do you think your player would test as — Force, Timing, Rhythm, or Elasticity? Drop it below 👇

Coaches: this exact system is what we teach inside the membership. Link in bio.

Address

Barnsley
S638NE

Telephone

+447368391477

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Speed Mechanic posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Speed Mechanic:

Shortcuts

Share

Category